As much as possible, Ignite papers will be reviewed by members of the editorial board to reduce review time. Ignite papers should have a maximum of 2000 words (not including abstract, reference list and figure/table legends) and 3 elements to summarize results in the form of figures or tables. In these cases, authors need to provide a strong justification for why they believe the pattern or process needs to be further investigated and which lines of research are necessary to uncover their causes. Results that focus on novel patterns and processes in nature at intermediate and large scales without having a strong explanatory basis for its origin are also of interest. These results should be considered as timely to address critical ecological research topics and ignite further and critical research to address them. IGNITE PAPERS are short contributions involving very specific and clear results from empirical (observational or experimental) or theoretical research. Transparent reporting of the synthesis process is required. Novelty, future research, and analysis of gaps are strongly encouraged versus summary. Synthesis is a critical component of modern ecology and involves big data in many forms. We welcome meta-analyses and systematic reviews provided quantitative analyses are included either of the literature or of the evidence reported within studies. Prospective authors are strongly encouraged to read the editorial on why many Forum manuscripts are unsuccessful. In particular, we encourage collaboration in debates to promote more effective synthesis and balance.Ī successful Forum paper includes novelty, an appeal to our general readership and is a topic that stands to generate synthesis in the field. Where uncertainties, problems, or debates in current theory are identified, authors are strongly encouraged to, wherever possible, highlight productive and positive lines of research that may resolve the issue. Purely speculative pieces are discouraged. It is an arena for challenging current thinking on ecological issues by revising established concepts and insights from critical experiments or for developing new theory to promote novel research. Forum articles must strive for conceptual unification and serve as a point of departure for future work rather than just summarizing existing bodies of theory and data. The format can be short notes or more substantial reviews to bring fields together, to transgress existing boundaries by synthesizing larger fields or seemingly disparate areas, and to offer new ways of interpreting existing data. RESEARCH PAPERS report original research in all fields of ecology and should aim at a readership from a wide range of ecological disciplines.įORUM PAPERS are the home for synthesis and review. Further information about double blind review can be found here. This has implications for manuscript formatting (see quick checklist below). Papers submitted to NSO journals are evaluated using double-blind peer review. However, all open access publications have article publication charges. There are no charges for publishing in the NSO journals. An EDI statement for the NSO journals can be found here. To make science more just, we ask our authors to declare whether the conduct of their study considers equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) when they submit their papers. Please carefully read this information before submitting. The NSO editorial and publishing policies regarding conflict of interest, authorship, roles of editors, copyright and licensing and open access conditions are compiled in the ethics and policies page. Oikos is published by the Nordic Society Oikos (NSO). Before submitting, please make sure that your article fits within the journal’s aims and scope. This page explains how to prepare your manuscript for submission to the journal Oikos, a Nordic Society Oikos publication.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |